Election Results
The Election Process
Nominee Profiles
Web Cast
Stories
Anglican Journal
Daily Report
General Synod Times
Media Kit
Media Registration
News Releases
Backgrounders
Agenda
Arriving at Synod
Brock University Map
Handbook
Reports and Resolutions
Logo
General Synod 2001
Minutes
Daily Report
Convening Circular
Council of General Synod
Memorials
Orders of the Day
Sessional Committees
Standing Committees
Worship
Reports and Resolutions
|
|
Subject: Colombia
Moved By: Matthew Kett, from
the Diocese of Toronto
Seconded By:
Note: The mover and the seconder must be members of the General Synod and be present in the House when the resolution is before the synod for debate.
BE IT RESOLVED:
That this General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada,
- Call on the Government of Canada to press the Colombian government to
fully implement recommendations made to it repeatedly by the United Nations
High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCR), to bring an end to human rights
abuses committed by the Colombian state security forces and the paramilitary,
to sever links between security forces and paramilitary groups and to guarantee
the rights of human rights defenders and other activists.
- Call on the Canadian government to strongly oppose growing U.S military
aid to Colombia (in both bilateral relations with the U.S. and multilateral
forums like the U.N.).
- Press the Canadian government to monitor Canadian corporations doing business
in Colombia (including crown corporations such as Export Development Canada)
to ensure their activities do not violate human rights.
- Press the Canadian government to continue to support a negotiated political
settlement to Colombia’s social and armed conflict
and strengthen the role of Colombia’s social organizations in any
future peace process.
- Urge the Government of Canada to support the call of the Office of the
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in Colombia to Colombian armed opposition
groups to respect international humanitarian law.
BACKGROUND
Colombians have experienced an internal armed conflict that has lasted over
four decades, a conflict fueled by large and growing equities. In this context,
the Colombian military has responded with a counter insurgency strategy that
has targeted the civilian population. Numerous U.N. reports have documented
how paramilitary death squads, operating with support of the army, have carried
out hundreds of massacres, as well as targeted assassinations and disappearances
of leaders of trade unions, churches, human rights groups, indigenous, peasant
and other organizations. As the war escalates, guerrilla movements mainly
the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC) and the Ejército
de Liberación Nacional (ELN) are also guilty of violations that
have included the use of child soldiers, assassinations and attacks that have
claimed civilian victims.
The human rights situation in Colombia remains the worst in the hemisphere
and one of the worst in the world. The average number of people killed or
disappeared as a result of socio-political violence has increased from 10
people a day (1996-1997) to about 20 people a day (2002-2003). About 15 of
these victims are non-combatants and are killed at home, on the street or
in their workplace.
The fragile peace process between the Colombian government and the FARC collapsed
in Feb. 2002 and the language of the “peace process” has been
replaced by the language of “democratic security” and the “war
on terror”.
Under the rubric of the “Democratic Security Agenda”, President
Uribe has taken measures that have led to the further militarization of civilian
life and the weakening and reduction of democratic institutions. In September
2003, the President publicly accused human rights and other civil society
organizations of being fronts for terrorist groups; in Colombia, such accusations
can be tantamount to a death threat as they give the paramilitary the green
light in their campaign of terror.
The conflict and the violations of human rights have been fueled by massive
amounts of military aid to the Colombian armed forces from the United States.
This military aid has increased above and beyond the $1.3 billion aid package
received through Plan Colombia. Although the European Union has spoken out
against Plan Colombia, the Canadian government has remained silent on the
issue of U.S. military aid to Colombia.
Colombia has become the 4th largest export market for Canadian exporters in
Latin America and Canada’s 25th largest export market in the world.
In addition, the Canadian government provides foreign aid to the Government
of Colombia. In July 2003 at an international donors meeting in London, Canada
was a co-signatory to a declaration which “underlined the importance
of the UN” and urged the Colombian government to implement the (UN Commission
on Human Rights) recommendations promptly”. The Canadian government
is proud of its role in helping to insert these conditions around human rights
into the London Declaration. The Colombian government has not only made no
progress towards implementing these recommendations they are actively pursuing
policies that are contrary to them.
Through the ecumenical programs of the Inter-Church Coalition for Human Rights
in Latin America (ICCHRLA) and now KAIROS, the Canadian churches have been
working in partnership with these social movements in Colombia since 1988.
This work has involved advocacy with the Canadian and Colombian governments
and with multilateral organizations like the UN, policy development, education
and solidarity. In May 1999 ICCHRLA organized a tribunal on a massacre that
took place in Barrancabermeja in May 1998. The findings and recommendations
of this tribunal resulted in the Canadian government holding hearings on Colombia
within the Standing Committee of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (SCFAIT).
More recently, since 2000, Inter-Church Action (ICA) and now KAIROS has provided
financial support to Colombian partners including human rights organizations,
women groups and churches for their work in human rights and peace building.
At the General Synods of 1998 and 2001, motions similar to the one presented
here were carried.
Source: |
|
|
(name of committee, diocese, etc.) |
Submitted by: |
|
|