Election Results
The Election Process
Nominee Profiles
Web Cast
Stories
Anglican Journal
Daily Report
General Synod Times
Media Kit
Media Registration
News Releases
Backgrounders
Agenda
Arriving at Synod
Brock University Map
Handbook
Reports and Resolutions
Logo
General Synod 2001
Minutes
Daily Report
Convening Circular
Council of General Synod
Memorials
Orders of the Day
Sessional Committees
Standing Committees
Worship
Reports and Resolutions
|
|
Subject: Rejection of War
as a Means of Resolving Conflict
Moved By: Phyllis Creighton
Seconded By: Sister Constance
Joanna Gefvert, SSJD of the Diocese of Toronto
Note: The mover and the seconder must be members of the General Synod and be present in the House when the resolution is before the synod for debate.
BE IT RESOLVED:
That this General Synod reject war as a means of resolving conflict, and
call on Anglicans at all levels in Canada to:
- Oppose the doctrine and policy of pre-emptive or preventive war
- Work to stop war being used as an instrument of policy
- Press for the means to teach people the skills of mediation, conflict
resolution, and reconciliation
- Urge Anglicans to engage themselves in learning and using these skills
for peace-building and reconciliation
- Press for the transfer of resources from war and militarism to urgent
social and environmental needs.
EXPLANATORY NOTE/ BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Past General Synods have denounced and sought to limit war. General Synod
2001 Act 24, in reaffirming support for the WCC’s Ecumenical Decade
to Overcome Violence, agreed to “promote a culture of non-violence .
. . that rejects violence as a means of solving problems.” Hopes that
the 21st century would break the cruel chain of 20th century warring were
quickly betrayed. Wars launched by the United States on Afghanistan and then
Iraq after the tragedy of 9/11 (11 Sept. 2001) rained down on civilians more
horrific weapons, notably cluster bombs (CB) and depleted uranium (DU) reinforced
munitions. More toxic lethal particles have been added to the legacy in Iraq
from the Gulf War and contaminate Afghanistan, in all likelihood adding to
the ongoing toll of cancer, leukemia, genetic defects, and death already also
seen in Yugoslavia and Kosovo. The nuclear powers, turning away from their
unequivocal commitment in 2000 to eliminate their nuclear arsenals, seek renewed
nuclear weapons development, spurred by the United States, which is bent on
new, smaller, more useable nuclear weapons, including the min-bunker buster.
The new U.S. policy of pre-emptive/ preventive war and its announced goal
of global dominance through space weaponization make plain that it will wield
force as the new norm of international relations. With the world moving on
the track of death, Earth is groaning from the pollution of war and militarism,
as well as from consumerism and the gap between rich and poor. Earth’s
plight, gross social and economic injustice, the crisis of poverty, and intolerable
unmet human needs worldwide: all call us to take strong steps to reject war
and redirect our efforts towards rebuilding peace, mending the ills of society,
and renewing Earth. The Gospel call to “love your enemy” and to
seek justice and reconciliation must shape our vision. The mounting worldwide
protest against war, seen in the millions who protested in the streets on
15 Feb. 2003, fuels new hope. “If we are determined, we have the capacity
to end war,” Nobelist Archbishop Desmond Tutu insists. This motion seeks
to move that vision forward. Peace is a human right. It is the destiny God
seeks for Earth and humanity reshaped in the image of Christ.
Source: |
|
|
(name of committee, diocese, etc.) |
Submitted by: |
|
|